From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 25 23:24:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA13175 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 25 Aug 1997 23:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sendero.i-connect.net (sendero-ppp.i-Connect.Net [206.190.143.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA13140 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 1997 23:24:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shimon@localhost) by sendero.i-connect.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) id XAA09716; Mon, 25 Aug 1997 23:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2-alpha [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199708260037.RAA10996@scorpio.focusplus.com> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 23:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Organization: Atlas Telecom From: Simon Shapiro To: "burt f." Subject: RE: ? power outages and file system corruption Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi "burt f."; On 26-Aug-97 you wrote: > > > Is the only way to protect against power-outage-caused file system > corruption to install a UPS? Someone mentioned to me that Sun > (yeah, i know it's Solaris, but i just wanted to know if there was > something analogous in FBSD) has some sort of disk/FS caching to > protect against this. In theory, a journaling filesystem will do that. Veritas is a good name for these. The problem with most of these is that a $300 UPS is cheaper and more reliable. Most such filesystems are attached to such an increase in complexity that the most common cause of curruption is a filesystem code bug. Even a UPS does not help you then. Simon