Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:02:49 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>, Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> Subject: Re: NOT installing the .la files Message-ID: <m3k67k3h1i.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20060613170732.tql5t2lsn4w4ggog@netchild.homeip.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:07:32 %2B0200") References: <200606112110.39148@aldan> <200606112151.36690@aldan> <20060612112217.tj1n52mv44wwogw4@netchild.homeip.net> <200606131635.29664.lofi@freebsd.org> <20060613170732.tql5t2lsn4w4ggog@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes: > As already visible in the mail you reply to: I agree that it is a good > idea to keep libtool as close as possible to the upstream version. Can we as port maintainers take this - and other relevant posts - as the "go ahead" for not jumping hoops to remove .la files if some third-party software we port installs them? -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3k67k3h1i.fsf>