From owner-cvs-all Mon Jun 18 9:47: 0 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C3637B406; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:46:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA57420; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:46:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:46:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200106181646.MAA57420@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Kris Kennaway Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/rarpd Makefile rarpd.8 rarpd.c In-Reply-To: <20010618092759.C9834@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200106180648.f5I6mXw73601@freefall.freebsd.org> <74656.992853414@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> <20010618092759.C9834@xor.obsecurity.org> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > -audit has turned into the defacto code review mailing list, though it > was originalliy intended only for security audits. Is it really > necessary to send patches to two mailing lists? Two, or three, or possibly even more. Patches should be sent to the mailing-lists where the people affected are most likely to be found. audit is almost never that list. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message