From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 09:42:54 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923BD106566B; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206918FC0A; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p5B32E9EA.dip.t-dialin.net [91.50.233.234]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC112844016; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:42:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (unknown [IPv6:fd73:10c7:2053:1::2:102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF02B2FDB; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:42:45 +0100 (CET) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.4/8.13.8/Submit) id p1S9gep2026852; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:42:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.ec.europa.eu (pslux.ec.europa.eu [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:42:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20110228104240.32245ke5o34pco40@webmail.leidinger.net> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:42:40 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Emanuel Haupt References: <20110226125814.3b0a46e5.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> <20110227145125.12961olps6d8bapw@webmail.leidinger.net> <20110228101541.1926b275.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110228101541.1926b275.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Dynamic Internet Messaging Program (DIMP) H3 (1.1.4) X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: CC112844016.A7F9E X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=1.275, required 6, autolearn=disabled, FSL_RU_URL 0.00, RDNS_NONE 1.27) X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamScore: s X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1299490970.14329@uhTFhiD/Dtjf4ezeg6Pjxw X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE quality of emulation@, freebsd-emulation@ ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:42:54 -0000 Quoting Emanuel Haupt (from Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:15:41 +0100): > Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Quoting Emanuel Haupt (from Sat, 26 Feb 2011 >> 12:58:14 +0100): >> >> > The distilator [1] shows that roughly 97% by a total of109969 all >> > referenced distfiles fail to download. Resulting in countless >> > timeouts. >> > >> > Excerpt from the most recent run: >> > >> > Maintainer ok bad % bad >> > emulation@FreeBSD.org 1005 45696 97.85% >> > freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org 1691 61577 97.33% >> >> > Ideas? >> >> Would it help to change the order of the master site list? I assume >> that there are some which have everything. > > Unfortunately that wouldn't be much help to people who use MASTER_SORT. Yes. > I believe the best way would be to cleanup Mk/bsd.sites.mk. In > particular MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX. I plan to have a look at a more recent linux distribution for our linux_base. If I get the time, and if it will be fedora based (probably it will, as it may make the update a little bit more easy), this may mean the list will go back to what it was... > ports-mgmt/distilator can help identifying those sites. For instance: > > $ distilator /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10/ > > Result: > http://people.freebsd.org/~ehaupt/misc/linux_base-f10-distilator.log.gz > > A quick check would suggests to only keep: > $ zcat linux_base-f10-distilator.log.gz | grep ^200 | awk '{print $3}' \ > | perl -e 'use URI; while(<>) { chomp(); $u=URI->new($_); print > $u->host . "\n"; }' \ > | sort | uniq > > archives.fedoraproject.org > ftp.quicknet.nl > ftp.rhd.ru > ftp.udl.es > mirror.steadfast.net > > ...but reducing MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX to those hosts shows that > not even those > mirrors are consistent. Hence my prior suggestion to get a complete :( > set of all distfiles > needed by ports using MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX and mirror those on > reliable mirrors. Should be easy to do (if a mirror is available). > I can assume that task if that's fine with emulation@ :-) I am fine with this. I try to deprecate the linux*f[6789]* ports this week (I have to make up my mind if it will be one or two months of grace time). If you just spend the time to have a look at the fc4 and f10 ones, everything should arrive at a sane situation after the expiration date. Bye, Alexander. -- Hindsight is an exact science. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137