Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:36:03 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sio => uart: one port is gone Message-ID: <20080916002823.E439@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <48CE5E9B.9000304@icyb.net.ua> References: <48CE5E9B.9000304@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Andriy Gapon wrote: > This is a fairly standard and old machine with 2 COM ports. > Recently (last Friday) I decided to update my RELENG_7 system and also > to transition from sio to uart. > > This what I had before the upgrade: > kernel: sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags > 0x10 on acpi0 > kernel: sio0: type 16550A > kernel: sio0: [FILTER] > kernel: sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2e8-0x2ef irq 3 on acpi0 > kernel: sio1: type 16550A > kernel: sio1: [FILTER] > > This is what I have now: > uart0: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > uart0: [FILTER] > > This is what I have in device.hints for uart: > hint.uart.0.at="isa" > hint.uart.0.port="0x3F8" > hint.uart.0.flags="0x10" > hint.uart.0.irq="4" > hint.uart.1.at="isa" > hint.uart.1.port="0x2F8" but it's shown as 0x2e8 above .. > hint.uart.1.irq="3" > hint.uart.2.at="isa" > > Precisely the same hints (s/uart/sio/) I had for sio. 0x2f8 is 'standard COM2' address .. did sio1 work ok at 0x2e8 before? cheers, Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080916002823.E439>