From owner-freebsd-standards  Thu Aug 22 14: 0:10 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B56237B400
	for <freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B22343E6A
	for <freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7ML06JU057494
	for <freebsd-standards@freefall.freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7ML06na057493;
	Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 14:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200208222100.g7ML06na057493@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Johan Karlsson <k@numeri.campus.luth.se>
Subject: Re: standards/41576: POSIX compliance of ln(1)
Reply-To: Johan Karlsson <k@numeri.campus.luth.se>
Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-standards.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-standards>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-standards>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

The following reply was made to PR standards/41576; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Johan Karlsson <k@numeri.campus.luth.se>
To: "Tim J. Robbins" <tjr@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: standards/41576: POSIX compliance of ln(1)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 22:51:04 +0200

 Hi Tim,
 
 it seems strange that, if something has been MFCed, the
 state was changed to patched. patched is usually use to
 indicate that the change should be MFCed. I think
 a better state would be analyzed or open for this PR.
 
 Take care
 /Johan
 
 On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:12 (-0700) +0000, Tim J. Robbins wrote:
 > Synopsis: POSIX compliance of ln(1)
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
 > State-Changed-By: tjr
 > State-Changed-When: Mon Aug 19 04:12:24 PDT 2002
 > State-Changed-Why: 
 > Manual page change has been MFC'd.
 > 
 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=41576
 > 
 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
 > with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
 > 
 
 -- 
 Johan Karlsson		mailto:k@numeri.campus.luth.se

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message