From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 8 14:49:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54E316A4CE for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:49:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713EB43D4C for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:49:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marchenko@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 74so39264rnk for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 07:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.152.63 with SMTP id z63mr79352rnd; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 07:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.22.66 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:49:15 -0400 From: Vlad To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman In-Reply-To: <20041008031737.GA1027@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041006090104.06710d85.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20041006203220.7f8e7b8a.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20041006192518.GM47017@green.homeunix.org> <20041006215134.GN47017@green.homeunix.org> <20041007010008.15274fbd.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20041007181852.GA73261@green.homeunix.org> <20041007191757.GB73261@green.homeunix.org> <20041008031737.GA1027@green.homeunix.org> cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Marc UBM Bocklet Subject: Re: [BETA7-panic] sodealloc(): so_count 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vlad List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:49:22 -0000 I've installed this patch. Working OK so far, but we don't have that number of hits coming in lately, so it's hard to tell is it helping or not. In only crashed for me when it was 60+ requests per second coming. I'll keep list posted. Btw, what's the usual procedure here to commit a certain patch into -current / -stable tree? Will it be ever added there? On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 23:17:38 -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:17:57PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:11:48PM -0400, Vlad wrote: > > > Brian, > > > > > > thanks for your work. Question: is this patch is something I can feel > > > comfortable about trying it on a production server? Did you test it? > > > > It is completely untested other than compilation. I don't have my SMP > > machine with console in front of me to be able to try to reproduce the > > problem, but I believe these changes to be relatively safe. > > Okay, now I do; I did a more thorough potential fix -- so if that worked > for you, this should do the same without a socket memory leak. The life > and times of sockets are fraught with peril... > > > > > > -- > Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ > <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ > Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\ > -- Vlad