From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 20 12:12:42 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA04308 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 12:12:42 -0700 Received: from miller.cs.uwm.edu (miller.cs.uwm.edu [129.89.35.13]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA04302 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 12:12:41 -0700 Received: (from james@localhost) by miller.cs.uwm.edu (8.6.10/8.6.10) id OAA12907 for hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 14:12:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 14:12:40 -0500 From: Jim Lowe Message-Id: <199506201912.OAA12907@miller.cs.uwm.edu> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: arp problem with 2.0.5? Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I am having trouble pinging a machine on my local network. The messages file shows the following error: /kernel: arplookup 129.89.9.13 failed: host is not on local network My ifconfig ed0 shows: ed0: flags=8a63 mtu 1500 inet 129.89.9.30 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 129.89.9.255 ether 00:00:c0:ce:32:50 I have about 90 hosts on 129.89.9 and they all seem to work with each other just fine. Just this particular 2.0.5 system and an ultrix system won't talk with each other. Other 2.0.5 systems work just fine. Other ultrix systems work just fine. The arp cache on the ultrix system (129.89.9.13) shows the 2.0.5 machine, but the 2.0.5 machine (129.89.9.30) doesn't show an arp entry for the ultrix machine. Anyone know where this error would come from or where to start bug swatting? -Jim