From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 15 12: 9:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B9237B401 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:09:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 27D5743EC2 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:09:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 44793 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Dec 2002 20:09:52 -0000 Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:09:52 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: Andreas Klemm Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Restoring superblock backup? In-Reply-To: <20021215090554.GA15162@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 12:41:58AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > > After the fs has been repaired, the alternate sb is not copied to the > > default sb (currently). > > This doesn't sound valid. It would mean, if your suberblock has > crashed and you use the alternate, then every subsequent fsck > run would fail and need manual operation to use the alternate > superblock. This is indeed the current (bad) behavior, hence my original request for a workaround. I'm working on a patch. -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message