From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 26 16:14:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA24584 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:14:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA24577 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:14:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA03549 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:11:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdnO3541; Wed Jan 27 00:10:54 1999 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:10:48 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Netgraph sync card success.. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In case others had been wondering John Hay proved that out blind patches to the if_sr driver do work, and he is able to use netgraph to communicate. The problems were mostly to do with configuration. On another note, do we have anyone who can test other sync cards? The driver for if_ar.c has been also reworked for netgraph but we have no testers. Are there ay other sync card owners who would like their driver's modified? I can probably do a driver on about 30 minutes. On another topic, does anyone have any ideas of node tyoes that they think we should implement? We completed the pp and vjc nodes in the latest snapshot. I've been thinking about the possibility of a NAT node.. and wondered if it wouldn't be possible to make a node that could do the ipfw operations on packets at the level where IP packets are being passed around netgraph. Just ideas.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message