From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 23 05:56:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17741065673 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 05:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [70.36.220.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4A58FC12 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 05:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-192-168-2-22.wifi.xcllnt.net (atm.xcllnt.net [70.36.220.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4N5NfU4013668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 22 May 2011 22:23:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 22:23:41 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <5E1F466E-FA00-4EB5-BC26-5389BB6C5416@xcllnt.net> References: To: Lars Eighner X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bring sio up to 8+ X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 05:56:24 -0000 On May 22, 2011, at 4:58 AM, Lars Eighner wrote: > > It seems increasing unlikely that uart will ever support the only internal > hardware modem recently available in the US (PR kern/155196), so what are > the chances of sio (which works in 7.x reasonably well and better with a > one-line hack) being brought forward? The PR states that uart(4) basically works, but that "reconnecting on demand" doesn't. What makes you think this is a problem with uart(4) and not with the TTY overhaul? -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net