Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 01:37:01 -0400 From: Laurence Berland <stuyman@confusion.net> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Linux Vs FreeBSD networking Code Message-ID: <370AEEFC.8E7F4CD1@confusion.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From a post on Slashdot:
** Duh!
** by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 06, @06:38PM EDT
** The key phrase is led to believe.
** Since Linux's networking code is completely new (not from
old BSD code) it took a long time to **catch up. Now it's quite a
bit faster then free bsd
** (and the benchmarks prove it, in fact, Linux has the
fastest network performance of any general purpose OS).
Anyone want to confirm or deny what this person is saying? I've heard
both sides argued, but not by anyone who is going beyond uninformed or
at least semi-uninformed bickering. Anyone have a more informed
perspective on the issue?
--
Laurence Berland, Stuyvesant HS Debate
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Windows 98: n.
useless extension to a minor patch release for
32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a
16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor,
written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for
1 bit of competition.
http://stuy.debate.net
icq #7434346 aol imer E1101
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?370AEEFC.8E7F4CD1>