From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 21 22:00:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF89106566C; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38D68FC1C; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id nBLM04dK095982; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:00:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBLM04QP095981; Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:00:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:00:04 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20091221220004.GA42400@alchemy.franken.de> References: <200912211943.nBLJhNUU038425@svn.freebsd.org> <200912211459.21766.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200912211459.21766.jhb@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r200797 - head/lib/libc/stdtime X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:00:07 -0000 On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:59:21PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 21 December 2009 2:43:23 pm John Baldwin wrote: > > Author: jhb > > Date: Mon Dec 21 19:43:23 2009 > > New Revision: 200797 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/200797 > > > > Log: > > Use _once() to initialize the pthread key for thread-local storage to hold > > the results of localtime() instead of using a pthread mutex directly. > > It would probably be simpler to use TLS for this instead, but I'm not sure if > we have working TLS on all supported platforms. > At least not on arm and sparc64 as the in-tree binutils predate GNU TLS support for these. Marius