From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 14 23:32:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEBFC037E1 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7375518ED for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:32:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 55836 invoked by uid 89); 14 Feb 2017 23:32:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.250.192?) (mg@grem.de@93.104.86.174) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 14 Feb 2017 23:32:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Expulsion of John Marino - reasons and impact? From: Michael Gmelin X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14D27) In-Reply-To: <930aa508-18e4-6951-7880-e7934a1be0bc@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:32:36 +0100 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <84F7C3CF-ECF2-4039-9D73-D45E5100F7E8@freebsd.org> References: <336aca05-3a85-5881-4c51-ea58d1d203a2@FreeBSD.org> <3FC190C8-2F60-4215-8BFB-A0C79FE04F17@freebsd.org> <930aa508-18e4-6951-7880-e7934a1be0bc@FreeBSD.org> To: Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:32:39 -0000 > On 15 Feb 2017, at 00:15, Bryan Drewery wrote: >=20 > On 2/14/2017 2:58 PM, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>>> On 14 Feb 2017, at 22:16, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>>> On 2/14/2017 12:50 PM, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: >>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D433827 >>> I think that commit message combined with >>> https://www.freebsd.org/internal/code-of-conduct.html is enough. >> The commit message basically says that he misbehaved once too often and t= he CoC defines what "misbehave" might mean. Not over the top transparent/det= ailed to be honest. >=20 > Right, would you want an organization you volunteered for to drag your > name through the mud for some reason? I don't think it's our place (the > project) to say more than we already have publicly. Please drop this > before it gets out of hand. Discussing people personally/negatively in > a public forum is not appropriate. >=20 Well, if it was something he said in public, pointing to it might be enlight= ening. On the other hand, I assume he could always do that himself if he fee= ls like it. One way or the other, I'll miss his positive contributions and I'm saddened t= hat this happened. -m