From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 23 19:43:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E2FB38A for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E010C1F7F for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F386140005 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:43:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id E98CA40006; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:43:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DEAR_SOMETHING autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.9 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (mx.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B84540005; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:43:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3gDXBq2RqDz8gh3; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:43:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id Eb79SgWxNGa5; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [10.1.0.4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3gDXBm6bCFz8gh0; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (78-69-168-131-no84.tbcn.telia.com [78.69.168.131]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3gDXBm5WZ3z9Cvt; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tifa.daemonic.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tifa.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6256822818; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <535817F0.8020706@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:43:44 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Werner Lehmann Subject: Re: Question about OpenGL Version on ATI Radeon HD 4850 using KMS References: <1398258416.2545.17.camel@amd64.my.domain> In-Reply-To: <1398258416.2545.17.camel@amd64.my.domain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:43:52 -0000 On 04/23/14 15:06, Werner Lehmann wrote: > Dear Sirs, > > first of all I would like to thank you for the wonderful job you have > done so far on implementing KMS on FreeBSD. As I have a Radeon HD 4850 > card in my windows-pc, I wanted to give it a try with FreeBSD 10.0 > (32bit) which I installed on a 4GB USB-Stick. I compiled xorg using the > options > > WITH_NEW_XORG=yes > WITH_GALLIUM=yes > > as described in https://wiki.freebsd.org/Graphics > > and also installed mesa-demos and a minimal graphical environment > (fluxbox) for testing. > > When typing 'glxinfo' I could see that I had direct rendering and OpenGL > 2.1. I also tested Darkplaces (pkg install darkplaces) and it ran fine, > at a resolution of 1680 x 1050 at approx. 40 fps, so wow! > > But my question is: Why only OpenGL 2.1, when according to mesa3g.org in > mesa 9.1 there is already OpenGL 3.1 and in mesa 10.1 OpenGL 3.3? > > What is missing and what still needs to be done and when can a higher > version of OpenGL be expected? > > Thank you very much! Can you post the complete output from glxinfo, and also a Xorg.log.0 or something like that. Regards! -- Niclas Zeising