Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 22:11:29 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, nate@mt.sri.com, toor@dyson.iquest.net, dyson@freebsd.org, karpen@ocean.campus.luth.se, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FYI: regarding our rfork(2) Message-ID: <199709192211.PAA08475@usr06.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199709192145.PAA20992@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Sep 19, 97 03:45:18 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > In any case, I'm convinced that it's necessary in order to fully support > > > C-Threads. > > > > Stacks in seperate address spaces are needed to fully support C-Threads? > > I'm convinced that you must *fully* share thread stacks in order to > be backwards compatible for C-Threads. You don't *have* to do that, but > then we're no longer backwards compatible. OK... I had a bit of pronoun trouble with "it's" there. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709192211.PAA08475>