Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:57:49 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r307045 - head/Mk Message-ID: <50D602AD.3000304@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1212220853420.2358@tuna.site> References: <201211060023.qA60NhFW028290@svn.freebsd.org> <5098E619.3070902@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1212211859090.2358@tuna.site> <CAF6rxg=zjg6E9uBaxA6iccXEL6i-Ok7bOMD_f6Wo3om=c%2BHzzw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1212220853420.2358@tuna.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 22/12/2012 20:54 Gerald Pfeifer said the following: > On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Eitan Adler wrote: >> Have you filed a PR about the broken ports? > > That's where "And, unlike compilation errors, failure to locate > run-time libraries (or the right ones) is a lot harder to detect > and we currently don't have a way to do so automatically" comes > into play, unfortunately. Or I would have. So, do you even recall why you even have those flags in CFLAGS? Or has it always been "just in case"? :-) -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50D602AD.3000304>