From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 09:57:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A1716A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4449F13C45E for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:57:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.251.178]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.0/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l559mlPV076197 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:48:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l559Z22F074410; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:35:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <46652DEF.1070709@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:33:35 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" References: <5fbf03c20706050031p6f25d02cyae7a91593e40171a@mail.gmail.com> <20070605082244.GB22215@com.bat.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070605082244.GB22215@com.bat.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: spil.oss@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [net/samba3] Upgrade to Samba 3.0.25a X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:57:39 -0000 Timur I. Bakeyev wrote: > I would like to stress, that after problems with the last Samba releases > I decided to delay new port for at least one week to collect feedback > from mailing lists and other sources, as well as from developers to see, > if there are no fatal problems with the release. Unfortunately, with > security updates we can't wait too long, thus 3.0.25 slipped into the > ports collection, although it possibly shouldn't. Ok, this is however not a fault in the way FreeBSD handles port. This time it's samba itself that should be blamed (although I'm not recriminating here). > I'm planning to ressurect net/samba3-devel port to put latest releases there, > leaving net/samba3 for proven to work releases. I don't think this issues are related. If you feel you should, then obviously go ahead, but, as I see it, both 3.0.25 and 3.0.25a would have gone into samba3, not samba3-devel. Just my two e-cents :-) bye av.