Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 09:30:12 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new monotime() call for all architectures. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011190925260.767-100000@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <200011181652.eAIGqgJ12738@gratis.grondar.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Mark Murray wrote: > > No! machine/cpufunc.h is for "Functions to provide access to special cpu > > instructions", not for functions that happen to call a (primitive) function > > in cpufunc.h. > > Then where? clock.h has already been thoroughly objected to. clock.c is a reasonable place for it. On i386's, it needs to access `tsc_present' which is currently only in clock.c. How much more (or less) efficient is the inline version? <machine/random.h> is another reasonable place for it. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0011190925260.767-100000>