Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:24:08 -0500 From: Anish Mistry <mistry.7@osu.edu> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Chris Hodgins <chodgins@cis.strath.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Idea about 'skeleton jail Message-ID: <200503131524.16075.mistry.7@osu.edu> In-Reply-To: <42348525.8080302@cis.strath.ac.uk> References: <1107178792.613.22.camel@spirit> <200503131051.40700.freebsd-hackers@evilcode.net> <42348525.8080302@cis.strath.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1486163.gezmYYZZT0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 13 March 2005 01:23 pm, Chris Hodgins wrote: > Samuel J. Greear wrote: > > Not a bad 'idea' at all, although I won't comment on semantics.=20 > > I had something implemented using fs stacking (in a very hackish > > way, and I believe it's lost now, so don't ask to see it...) to > > implement per-jail quota's that seemed to work quite well. > > > > Sam > > Feel free to comment on the semantics. As I said before, I am not > very knowledgable about filesystems and any insight or alternative > implementation you can provide would be interesting I'm sure to > everyone. > Yeah, if there was jailfs that was setup automatically for the jails=20 that supported quotas out of the box that would kill my major gripe=20 about setting up jails. =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart1486163.gezmYYZZT0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCNKFwxqA5ziudZT0RAonEAJ0eykBFRqCIFSjwjbV7yokVTQ6TwgCgw7N+ ZA5Cge8SNspgGcb4fErKnQo= =CbsS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1486163.gezmYYZZT0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503131524.16075.mistry.7>