Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:57:57 +0300 From: Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: nullfs: vop_rename: fdvp is locked but should not be Message-ID: <86fx16onx6.fsf@zhuzha.ua1>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
Having a kernel compiled with DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS and doing something like below:
mount -t nullfs /tmp/1 /tmp/2
mv /tmp/1/test.file /tmp/2/
I have a panic (checked on 8-STABLE and CURRENT):
vop_rename: fdvp locked: 0xc70c82b0 is locked but should not be
KDB: enter: lock violation
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:246
#1 0xc04ed519 in db_fncall (dummy1=1, dummy2=0, dummy3=-1056863104, dummy4=0xe858a8d4 "")
at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:548
#2 0xc04ed911 in db_command (last_cmdp=0xc0e195dc, cmd_table=0x0, dopager=1)
at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:445
#3 0xc04eda6a in db_command_loop () at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:498
#4 0xc04ef90d in db_trap (type=3, code=0) at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_main.c:229
#5 0xc08e9f66 in kdb_trap (type=3, code=0, tf=0xe858aa7c) at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_kdb.c:535
#6 0xc0bfcc3b in trap (frame=0xe858aa7c) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:690
#7 0xc0bddffb in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:165
#8 0xc08ea0ea in kdb_enter (why=0xc0ce2dbf "vfslock", msg=0xc0ce2db0 "lock violation") at cpufunc.h:71
#9 0xc094a881 in vfs_badlock (msg=0xc0ce2ddc "is locked but should not be",
str=0xc0ce38b9 "vop_rename: fdvp locked", vp=0xc70c82b0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:3701
#10 0xc094e4f5 in assert_vop_unlocked (vp=0xc70c82b0, str=0xc0ce38b9 "vop_rename: fdvp locked")
at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:3733
#11 0xc094e7d7 in vop_rename_pre (ap=0xe858ac1c) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:3792
#12 0xc0c16a46 in VOP_RENAME_APV (vop=0xc0df8960, a=0xe858ac1c) at vnode_if.c:1472
#13 0xc0956d47 in kern_renameat (td=0xc6596a00, oldfd=-100,
old=0xbfbfe953 <Address 0xbfbfe953 out of bounds>, newfd=-100,
new=0xbfbfe968 <Address 0xbfbfe968 out of bounds>, pathseg=UIO_USERSPACE) at vnode_if.h:636
#14 0xc0956ef6 in kern_rename (td=0xc6596a00, from=0xbfbfe953 <Address 0xbfbfe953 out of bounds>,
to=0xbfbfe968 <Address 0xbfbfe968 out of bounds>, pathseg=UIO_USERSPACE)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:3569
#15 0xc0956f29 in rename (td=0xc6596a00, uap=0xe858acf8) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:3546
#16 0xc0bfc370 in syscall (frame=0xe858ad38) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1111
#17 0xc0bde090 in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:261
#18 0x00000033 in ?? ()
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(kgdb) fr 11
#11 0xc094e7d7 in vop_rename_pre (ap=0xe858ac1c) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:3792
3792 ASSERT_VOP_UNLOCKED(a->a_fdvp, "vop_rename: fdvp locked");
(kgdb) list
3787 ASSERT_VI_UNLOCKED(a->a_fvp, "VOP_RENAME");
3788 ASSERT_VI_UNLOCKED(a->a_fdvp, "VOP_RENAME");
3789
3790 /* Check the source (from). */
3791 if (a->a_tdvp != a->a_fdvp && a->a_tvp != a->a_fdvp)
3792 ASSERT_VOP_UNLOCKED(a->a_fdvp, "vop_rename: fdvp locked");
3793 if (a->a_tvp != a->a_fvp)
3794 ASSERT_VOP_UNLOCKED(a->a_fvp, "vop_rename: fvp locked");
3795
3796 /* Check the target. */
On kernels without DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS it looks like mv does not cause any
problems, although the behavior differs from moving the file to itself on ufs:
on ufs the file remains unchanged, while when moving like in the example above
the file disappears.
So, do we have false ASSERT here and additional check should be performed
before calling ASSERT_VOP_UNLOCKED(), e.g. checking that
((struct null_node*)(a->a_fdvp->v_data))->null_lowervp != a->a_fdvp?
Is this worth adding such check?
--
Mikolaj Golub
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fx16onx6.fsf>