From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 21:33:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5190416A4CE; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:33:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dglawrence.com (dsl-230-156.ipns.com [209.210.230.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06C643D39; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:33:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: from opteron.dglawrence.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dglawrence.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1LLXcPv092766; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:33:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: (from dg@localhost) by opteron.dglawrence.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1LLXbSx092765; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:33:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:33:37 -0800 From: "David G. Lawrence" To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20050221213337.GC87259@opteron.dglawrence.com> References: <20050221210834.GB87259@opteron.dglawrence.com> <45820.1109020342@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45820.1109020342@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: Christian Jachmann cc: Robert Watson cc: David Schultz cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Load over 1000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:33:39 -0000 > In message <20050221210834.GB87259@opteron.dglawrence.com>, "David G. Lawrence" > writes: > >> aren't being serviced isn't a bug. The reason the load on systems with > >> many processes is typically low is that most processes are blocked on I/O > >> -- either waiting for it to complete, waing for a network packet, or > >> waiting for the user, so they're idle the rest of the time. The CPU sits > >> there waiting for the world to catch up... > > > > The load average has historically meant the number of processes either > >running/ready to run OR blocked by short term (disk I/O) wait. > > No, disk I/O sleeps is not involved. > > The loadavg is the length of the runqueue. Any process sleeping, > on network, disk or timer, is not counted towards the total. I said "historically". :-) This was changed in FreeBSD a some years ago. -DG David G. Lawrence President Download Technologies, Inc. - http://www.downloadtech.com - (866) 399 8500 TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com - (888) 346 7175 The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Pave the road of life with opportunities.