From owner-cvs-all Mon Jan 17 14:26:36 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from m0.cs.berkeley.edu (m0.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.176]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1AA14D0C; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:26:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca7-245.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.245]) by m0.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA59168; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:25:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id OAA02984; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:24:53 -0800 (PST) To: Alexey Zelkin Cc: Brian Feldman , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssh Makefile References: <200001152317.PAA66493@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000117221910.B15401@scorpion.crimea.ua> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 17 Jan 2000 14:24:49 -0800 In-Reply-To: Alexey Zelkin's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:19:10 +0300" Message-ID: Lines: 10 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * From: Alexey Zelkin * Why not ? We already have such precedents in source and doc trees. Why * not apply it to ports also ? MAINTAINER lines in the source and doc tree are just comments, so you can write whatever you want. The ones in the ports tree are actually used, and could break some scripts if you stray from the norm. :) -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message