Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 09:13:30 +0000 From: marko@uk.radan.com Message-ID: <E10HOlV-000PqX-00@post.mail.demon.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 28 February 1999 at 12:54:38 -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
> > Ben Smithurst wrote:
> >>
> >> On my machine "/" is a separate filesystem, but if you've got so
> >> little space it probably won't hurt to stick them all on one
> >> filesystem.
> >>
> >> Perhaps someone can tell me why my method is a bad idea, if it is.
> >
> Ben is right: on such a tiny disk, you shouldn't have more than one
> file system.
>
Would a single filesystem not cause problems if the system went down
ungracefully, e.g. a sudden power cut?. I'm thinking of the situation
when the system comes up single user because it can't mount a
corrupted /usr and/or /var, requiring you to fsck them manually. In
this case would it still be able to mount / read-only, even though it
was on the same filesystem as /usr?
>
> Greg
> --
--
FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org
My Webpage http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~markov
_______________________________________________________________
Mark Ovens, CNC Apps Engineer, Radan Computational Ltd. Bath UK
CAD/CAM solutions for Sheetmetal Working Industry
mailto:marko@uk.radan.com http://www.radan.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E10HOlV-000PqX-00>