From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 11 22:11:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F0714C1C; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 22:11:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22356; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 23:11:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA02041; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 23:11:38 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908120511.XAA02041@harmony.village.org> To: "Brian F. Feldman" Subject: Re: libcompat proposition Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 11 Aug 1999 23:39:46 EDT." References: Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 23:11:38 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message "Brian F. Feldman" writes: : What do you all think about growing a gnu subdirectory in src/lib/libcompat? : Things like a getopt_long implementation (yes, if it will be accepted, : I am volunteering to write it...) would go there, and all sorts of lame : GNU libc cruft that we can try to be more compatible with. src/gnu/lib/libgnucompat might be better if is was GPL code. We've been trying to keep GPL'd code walled off from other code in the system. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message