From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 13:27:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923BB1065675 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A098FC24 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PS8RM-0003cW-TM for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:27:44 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:27:44 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:27:44 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:27:33 +0100 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <20101209141412.GA62013@relay.ibs.dn.ua> <20101213130833.GF80898@relay.ibs.dn.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <20101213130833.GF80898@relay.ibs.dn.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: what is the best way to use free space on several boxes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:27:46 -0000 On 13/12/2010 14:08, Zeus V Panchenko wrote: > Ivan Voras (ivoras@freebsd.org) [10.12.09 17:15] wrote: >> >> From one side, you can simply create large files within the existing >> file systems (e.g. a 300 GB file on each) to serve as virtual disks, >> export them with iSCSI, import them on another box and create a ZFS >> raidz volume out of those drives - you get a small amount of fault >> tolerance here. The bad sides are: you need to have a large "fixed >> space" file on each of the machines (you can theoretically create sparse >> files but the downsides are even worse), only one box can see the >> consolidated space (the ZFS volume), > > what if i set cluster of FreeNAS-es and export to it the files as ZFS space? If the machines are used by nothing else except FreeNAS, it makes things somewhat simpler since you don't have to share the space. It would work, probably similar to what I've described.