Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 17:05:40 +0800 From: Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth <shocking@prth.pgs.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: shocking@bandicoot.prth.tensor.pgs.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Porting Linux Device drivers Message-ID: <199904280905.RAA10274@ariadne.tensor.pgs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "28 Apr 1999 11:00:41 %2B0200." <xzplnfd5dc6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> shocking@prth.pgs.com (Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth) writes:
> > The problem I'm having is that I'm using the glide Linux
> > binaries to test the device, and the positive return values are being
> > trapped somewhere and turned into -1, an obvious failure which the
> > Linux glide library interprets as an error, spitting the dummy.
>
> The userland part of the syscall mechanism stores the returned value
> in errno and returns ((ret == 0) ? p_retval[0] : -1). Hence, if you
> want to return a specific value, store it in p_retval[0] and return 0
> to indicate success.
>
Do you mean the bit within libc? This is odd, as the app I'm running to test
this is a Linux binary. I've tried adding this within the code to handle these
ioctls in linux_ioctl.c, but don't seem to be having any joy. Should I be
looking a bit higher, within the linuxulator syscall mechanism?
Stephen
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
the Complete Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
this is not true." Robert Wilensky, University of California
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904280905.RAA10274>