From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue May 20 12:28:31 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA20870
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 20 May 1997 12:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.ts.kiev.ua (viking.ts.kiev.ua [193.124.229.195])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA20864
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 20 May 1997 12:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aviion.ts.kiev.ua by smtp1.ts.kiev.ua with SMTP id WAA11271;
  (8.8.3/zah/2.1) Tue, 20 May 1997 22:11:10 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from nbki.ipri.kiev.ua by aviion.ts.kiev.ua with ESMTP id SAA24541;
  (8.6.11/zah/2.1) Tue, 20 May 1997 18:52:09 GMT
Received: from cki.ipri.kiev.ua by nbki.ipri.kiev.ua with ESMTP id QAA05538;
  (8.6.9/zah/1.1) Tue, 20 May 1997 16:59:27 +0100
Received: from 194.44.146.14 (mac.ipri.kiev.ua [194.44.146.14]) by cki.ipri.kiev.ua (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA01881; Tue, 20 May 1997 17:15:43 +0300 (EET DST)
Message-ID: <3381A43C.3FAA@cki.ipri.kiev.ua>
Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 16:16:34 +0300
From: Ruslan Shevchenko <rssh@cki.ipri.kiev.ua>
Reply-To: rssh@cki.ipri.kiev.ua
Organization: IPRI
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Macintosh; I; 68K)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
CC: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD
References: <199705151553.IAA22312@conceptual.com>
			<199705151725.KAA15126@phaeton.artisoft.com> <199705151815.MAA01989@rocky.mt.sri.com> <337B7859.774F@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> 
> Nate Williams wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, how many of these are still in business selling highly parallel
> > systems?  Sounds like failure to me...
> >
> Well the new UNIX owners chose to work on this thing further which
> should, in fact, show that it is a complete failure, as everything
> associated with SCO. :-)
> Parallel computing is not cost effective, but MOSIX, MPC and the other
> options we are looking are free.
> 
>                 Pedro.
> 
> > Nate

In just have read in magazin, than IBM receive a good cashe from
 RS6000/SP