From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 11 16:49:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from wombat.bytecraft.au.com (wombat.bytecraft.au.com [203.39.118.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9BD37B401; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 16:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lt99101401.bytecraft.au.com (unknown [203.39.118.42]) by wombat.bytecraft.au.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E6003F0C; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 09:49:25 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <01a201c152af$5b09ae00$2a7627cb@bytecraft.au.com> Reply-To: "MurrayTaylor" From: "MurrayTaylor" To: , Subject: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 09:49:23 +1000 Organization: Bytecraft Systems MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As the WanIC-405 is being phased out (according to my supplier down under here in OZ), has any development / testing been done on the apparent replacement, the WanIC-521 (522, 524 ... ) range I am especially interested in its compatibility with its predecessor which I am using very successfully for frame relay under Netgraph. I'm trying to get compatability info from the supplier here, but we are a long way down the food chain ;-( Tia Murray Taylor Bytecraft Systems Pty Ltd murraytaylor@bytecraftsystems.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message