From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 5 18:42:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA04944 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 May 1997 18:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA04936 for ; Mon, 5 May 1997 18:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost.lan.awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA02158; Tue, 6 May 1997 02:41:58 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199705060141.CAA02158@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: brian@utell.co.uk Subject: LQR in ppp Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 02:41:57 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Can anyone still make the client side LQR stuff fail ? I used to be able to reproduce it with my ISP, but now I can't get it to fail with ppp (-current) <=> ppp (2.2) or with ppp (-current) to my ISP. I've waited 'till my side has sent 0x117 and received 0x10e, so there's no "total diff is 5" type error AFAIK. I'm pretty sure that nobody specifically fixed it.... maybe I'm wrong (ache - you've been in the code a bit, don't be shy). Lot's of stuff hasn't been put back into 2.2 (yet), so I'd appreciate testing on -current if possible -- please. TIA. -- Brian , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....