Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 19:40:19 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile Message-ID: <CADLo83-1Az-xJ0qnFU7NUAqCpRfARnM0bvp60hTvPOZRLztaOA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838TKwEZwLfXsAYmXowKweM8MiC5=BT5NFGyegWyubcX=A@mail.gmail.com> References: <201112181751.pBIHpivv027591@repoman.freebsd.org> <4EEF0AF1.20501@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo838TKwEZwLfXsAYmXowKweM8MiC5=BT5NFGyegWyubcX=A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19 December 2011 10:03, Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 19 Dec 2011 09:59, "Doug Barton" <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks, that's 1/3 of the job done. :) =A0The problem is that the curren= t >> OPTION creates the false idea that the only way you can lock your screen >> is to use xlockmore. >> >> Perhaps you missed my followup where I mentioned that the next step >> would be to add an OPTION for xscreensaver as well, and the logic to >> avoid having them both defined. OK, before I commit another patch.... Are you sure it's necessary to avoid having both defined? It won't break anything to have both enabled, and they're both disabled by default... Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-1Az-xJ0qnFU7NUAqCpRfARnM0bvp60hTvPOZRLztaOA>