From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 30 11: 7:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ACF37B6AE for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:06:57 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f0UJ6tr05100; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:06:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:06:55 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jeff Roberson Cc: "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Kevents/libc_r ? Message-ID: <20010130110655.S26076@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <31E4B6337A4FD411BD45000102472E0C05E74C@EMAIL_SERVER> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <31E4B6337A4FD411BD45000102472E0C05E74C@EMAIL_SERVER>; from jeff@midstream.com on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 11:07:05AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jeff Roberson [010130 11:05] wrote: > Does anyone know if it's safe to use kevents with pthreads yet? I poked > around and saw that it is handled in libc_r/uthread, but I also noticed that > my process that should be waiting in kqread is actually waiting in poll. If > I remove -pthread from the compile line it waits in kqread again! Is > pthreads just using poll for timeouts? pthreads puts the kevent into the array of pollfds that it uses to do non-blocking operations. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message