From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 04:16:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0E516A4CF for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:16:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from wn1.sci.kun.nl (wn1.sci.kun.nl [131.174.8.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B17843D45 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:16:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@sci.kun.nl) Received: from wn4.sci.kun.nl [131.174.8.3] (helo=wn4.sci.kun.nl) by wn1.sci.kun.nl (8.12.10/3.67) with ESMTP id i2QCGGK6022179; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:16:16 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 13:16:16 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: Tim Middleton In-Reply-To: <200403260654.54218.x@Vex.Net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: python@freebsd.org cc: kde-freebsd@freebsd.kde.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] aging broken supposed-to-be-deleted py-kde X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: adridg@cs.kun.nl List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:16:21 -0000 Hi Tim, On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Tim Middleton wrote: > I was jus thinking of slapping together a little KDE app (just a little > personal thingy), and thought PyKDE would be the way to go. But i see the > port is out of date, and in fact marked BROKEN... the broken message warning > that it will be removed Feb 2 (ie. over a month ago). Yes. The status of the port is uncertain. I know someone in kde@ wanted to revice the port itself. Me, I'm pushing for more pyQt inclusion in the kdebindings package _and_ a sensible split of that package into language-specific stuff. > I took a quick look at the port, thinking of updating it... but it has some > stuff in it that looks confusing to me... so i'm wondering if anyone else out > there is using PyKDE on freebsd... and might want to take a stab at updating > the port... What's needed is someone who really cares about it, and is willing to make it work. Your message underscores the chicken-and-eggness of the whole issue: people would like to use pyKDE or some other language binding, but find it's not available, broken, or immature, and end up going back to C++.