From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 06:52:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EF19E5 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [IPv6:2001:470:28:38a::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D411D8FC08 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:52:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.liukuma.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809521CCBB; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:52:31 +0200 (EET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=liukuma.net; s=liukudkim; t=1355381551; bh=sWBx2kuBROn765megj+SJNwbx/c/r+hM3joS3AyrPK0=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=bQ4lA2ngqVSYHQO1acfidF6gPZ43lUeS4OULeFJYuLQPJn7MvPcHiTrg/4ZtiHpzg XS6+X+IWdel7zUnLQEtQxqYa+OEV6Z7fUFNXvwntRjHOxNAAFAxJvm5lDbxyH+FhSs A2cjrxKkG15rgG9yX9pSJkrfkr5Z94TzzGeyqF1k= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at liukuma.net Received: from www.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 8eDJO41qhgGx; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:52:09 +0200 (EET) Received: from Rivendell (dsl-kmibrasgw1-fe47de00-175.dhcp.inet.fi [80.222.71.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: ignatz@www.liukuma.net) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C12251CCB5; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:52:08 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: From: "Reko Turja" To: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" , "FreeBSD Hackers" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS. Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 08:52:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:52:41 -0000 -----Original Message-----=20 From: Zaphod Beeblebrox=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 6:57 PM=20 To: FreeBSD Hackers=20 Subject: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS.=20 > So... I have two machines. My Fileserver is a core-2-duo machine with > FreeBSD-9.1-ish ZFS, istgt and samba 3.6. My workstation is windows 7 > on an i7. Both have GigE and are connected directly via a managed > switch with jumbo packets (specifically 9016) enabled. Both are using > tagged vlan packets to the switch (if that matters at all). My experience on samba has been that it=E2=80=99s slow whatever one does = to tweak it (probably just too linux-centric code to start with or = whatever...) Just as another datapoint =E2=80=93 do you have tried NFS = yet? Win7 has NFS available as OS component, although not installed by = default? -Reko From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 10:35:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBE3E40 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pczanik@fang.fa.gau.hu) Received: from intmail-smtp-out.integrity.hu (intmail-smtp-out.integrity.hu [212.52.165.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A3C8FC13 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by intmail-smtp-out.integrity.hu (Postfix, from userid 10000) id BB31413468B7; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:26:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from linux-dbr3.site (unknown [10.254.0.13]) (Authenticated sender: czanik@integrity.hu) by intmail-smtp-out.integrity.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A5A3134689D for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:26:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50C9AD39.2010103@fang.fa.gau.hu> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:26:01 +0100 From: Peter Czanik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Syslog-ng weirdness on 9.1-RELEASE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at mail-autosubmit X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:52:51 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:35:24 -0000 Hello, Mark Saad longcount.org> writes: > > All > I am wondering if anyone has seen this. I pulled down the 9.1-RELEASE > install media and did a clean install . After installing some ports from > the packages on > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable > > I noticed that syslog-ng is spinning out of control with a stock config. > > ps shows I have two syslog-ng pids That is normal, one is the supervisor, the other one does the actual logging part: http://www.balabit.com/wiki/syslog-ng-faq-supervisor > the lower numbed pid is idle and the higher numbed pid is spinning out of > control As it turned out, 3.3.6 was buggy on FreeBSD when reading kernel messages (the bundled ivykis library was changed from the BalaBit maintained fork to upstream). You should use 3.3.7 from ports and read the related entry from /usr/ports/UPDATING Bye, CzP