Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 May 2016 21:32:31 +0000
From:      Olivier Duchateau <olivierd@freebsd.org>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>, marino@freebsd.org, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r415078 - in head: . Mk
Message-ID:  <20160521213231.7ce1b88755748e7996e55cc9@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160521183643.GL21899@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <20160513201919.GA48945@FreeBSD.org> <CAPyFy2A9L1cCikOrgBAWUo0GTCLJ4EgzqukhobaJp%2BZqv7_SpQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160519122306.GA24015@FreeBSD.org> <20160521112728.GA624@FreeBSD.org> <364d3d9f-63ff-18c8-c730-a11c57dc0673@marino.st> <20160521114358.GC624@FreeBSD.org> <20160521122522.GJ21899@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20160521162931.GA97771@FreeBSD.org> <43145C09-EC33-4738-9FE7-5DC34A74D64B@adamw.org> <20160521183507.GB96389@FreeBSD.org> <20160521183643.GL21899@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 21 May 2016 20:36:43 +0200
Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 06:35:07PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:11:12AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> > > > On 21 May, 2016, at 10:29, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 02:25:22PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > >> Implementing it as a Makefile variable would make it not automatically
> > > >> updated.
> > > > 
> > > > Even if we can agree on REP_TIMESTAMP variable, why `make makesum' cannot
> > > > sed -i the Makefile?
> > > 
> > > Oh god, please, no. Please do not mess with Makefiles.
> > > 
> > > Rather than having it come from 'makesum', can an svn hook write it to
> > > distinfo? May help it stay more current.
> > 
> > I understand your worries, but SVN already messes with Makefiles (keywords).
> > On the other hand, adding $Id$ to distinfo would both 1) solve the problem,
> > at least as I see it now, and 2) won't mix data with metadata which is I'm
> > debating against.
> > 
> > Baptiste, was adding $Id$ to distinfo considered/tested?  If yes, why was it
> > rejected?
> > 
> It won't work because keywords are not expanded in git and hg (and yes we do
> officially support our git mirror)

About Mercurial (hg), it supports keywords too. It's even an official extension.

> 
> Best regards,
> Bapt


-- 
Olivier Duchateau <olivierd@freebsd.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160521213231.7ce1b88755748e7996e55cc9>