From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 4 2:16:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from tkc.att.ne.jp (tkc.att.ne.jp [165.76.16.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D78937BFF2 for ; Thu, 4 May 2000 02:16:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp) Received: from work.mzaki.nom (63.pool6.tokyo.att.ne.jp [165.76.23.78]) by tkc.att.ne.jp (8.8.8+Spin/3.6W-CONS(10/24/99)) id SAA22978; Thu, 4 May 2000 18:16:40 +0900 (JST) Received: from work.mzaki.nom (mzaki@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by work.mzaki.nom (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA10022 for ; Thu, 4 May 2000 18:16:39 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp) Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 18:16:37 +0900 Message-ID: <86itwu65fu.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp> From: Motomichi Matsuzaki To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NS DP83932 SONIC driver X-Mailer: Wanderlust/2.2.12 (Joyride) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by WEMI 1.13.7 - "Shimada") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi. I ported SONIC ethernet driver into FreeBSD from NetBSD/pc98. The original driver (named 'sn') on NetBSD/pc98 is for several NEC C-bus(alike ISA) and PCMCIA card. There is already 'sn' driver on FreeBSD for SMC 9xxx series ethernet, so I renamed to 'snc' after "SONIC". Is there any objection to this name? And I wonder, Is there any ISA card using this chip? For both 5-current and 4-stable source codes (beta quality) are: http://triaez.kaisei.org/~mzaki/sonic/ Thank you. -- Motomichi Matsuzaki Dept. of Biological Sciences, Grad. School of Science, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message