Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:10:01 -0500 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>, michael johnson <ahze@ahze.net>, ports@freebsd.org, Fred Cox <sailorfred@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE Message-ID: <20060713011001.GB57064@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <1152752348.53082.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <b2203fed0607121638l3b1f8a52ke338accdac69d98b@mail.gmail.com> <20060712234839.62961.qmail@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060713005600.GA57064@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <1152752348.53082.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 08:59:08PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 19:56 -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 04:48:39PM -0700, Fred Cox wrote: > > > Those man pages for whatis are pretty radically > > > different in size. Maybe they are mergeable, but > > > there's going to be a fair amount of work doing that > > > for all possible conflicts. > >=20 > > They are generated files see makewhatis(1). There will probably be a > > few real conflicts, but it's unlikely to be a serious issue. >=20 > It may be more serious than you think. Currently, GNOME and KDE will > conflict with each other if this move happens. We will have to either > come up with a new pseudo-port to handle common files, or find some > other way of consolidating things. That should be a pretty easy thing to check out. Just installing GNOME and KDE on the same machine and then running: "cat /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS | sort | uniq -d" would give a list of all potential duplicate files. Running pkg_which on those with both prefixes would give you all the conflicts after screening out generated files. It's certainly a real issue, but i double it's all that bad. It's not as though other projects haven't solved some version of this. -- Brooks --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEtZ1pXY6L6fI4GtQRAqrOAKDD3ExX1pzXHLPVOFShlHPRLpFLcwCgnMLa 3TIgD0rnaS9csg6j0+ujkRE= =fBUm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060713011001.GB57064>