From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 26 16:17:53 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB4D1065676
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:17:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net)
Received: from smtp.zeninc.net (smtp.zeninc.net [80.67.176.25])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9896A8FC19
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:17:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from astro.zen.inc (astro.zen.inc [192.168.1.239])
	by smtp.zeninc.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id 296F02798BD
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 17:00:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: by astro.zen.inc (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 179121702E; Sat, 26 Mar 2011 17:00:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 17:00:35 +0100
From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org>
To: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20110326160034.GA62127@zeninc.net>
References: <4D8CC2C5.7020508@earthlink.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D8CC2C5.7020508@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less.
Subject: Re: SPD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:17:53 -0000

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:28:53PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Hi,

Hi.


> If one has multiple entries in the SPD some representing more specific 
> network addresses not to be encrypted and sent over an
> ipsec tunnel vs more general networks that would be encrypted would this 
> work?
> 
> In other words say I have a x.x.0.0/16 that should encrypted but in that 
> x.x.0.0/16 I don't want x.x.84.0/23
> to be encrypted could I do that? If so is dependent on the order the SPD 
> entries are made?

Yes, SPD entries are ordered.

Just set up first specific SPD entries for traffic which must not be
encrypted, then the tunnel/transport entries for networks.


Yvan.