From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 23 18:56:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A8816A400 for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 18:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from plato.miralink.com (mail.miralink.com [70.103.185.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E976A13C447 for ; Wed, 23 May 2007 18:56:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B464D619C89; Wed, 23 May 2007 11:56:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from plato.miralink.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (plato.miralink.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14494-05; Wed, 23 May 2007 11:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.40] (iago.office.miralink.com [10.0.0.40]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D23619C54; Wed, 23 May 2007 11:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46548E72.4040400@miralink.com> Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:56:50 -0700 From: Sean Bruno User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.org References: <465233FF.8060100@miralink.com> <20070522.094257.74690293.imp@bsdimp.com> <4653DCC9.5060108@bulinfo.net> <20070523.091856.-1253046332.imp@bsdimp.com> <4654588F.8090002@miralink.com> In-Reply-To: <4654588F.8090002@miralink.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed May 23 11:56:51 2007 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.7829 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 46548e73132441804284693 X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.466 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 autolearn=ham tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, DSPAM_HAM=-0.1] X-Spam-Score: -4.466 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: Re: [nanobsd] Calculation of new flash image size X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 18:56:52 -0000 Sean Bruno wrote: > M. Warner Losh wrote: >> In message: <4653DCC9.5060108@bulinfo.net> >> Krassimir Slavchev writes: >> : What about diskinfo? >> : I always use output from diskinfo -v without any problems. >> > diskinfo reports the same information when I ran it, but thanks! >> diskinfo and fdisk -I use the same data, that is often wrong with SCSI >> adapters. If it works for you, then you are lucky. The problem is >> the geometry that's reported by the adapters. >> >> Warner >> > As far as I know, my disk is not SCSI. I am using an IDE flash disk > and the drive is coming up as 'ad0' > > If I am calculating the disk size correctly, what else could be > causing nanobsd to hang at the boot loader startup? > > Sean > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-embedded > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-embedded-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Ok...I'm a total idiot. I have the customize_cmd cust_comconsole in my nano configuration. This causes it to only have a console on a the serial port, DUH! /me waves his hands in a jedi fashion and says "This isn't the bug you are looking for." Sean