From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 26 15:40:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6446E1065674; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lbr@nerdheaven.dk) Received: from tux.nerdheaven.dk (tux.nerdheaven.dk [193.88.12.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF4C13C45D; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lbr@nerdheaven.dk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tux.nerdheaven.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52983FF4E; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:40:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from tux.nerdheaven.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tux.nerdheaven.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84265-10; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:40:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by tux.nerdheaven.dk (Postfix, from userid 1021) id 3BABE3FF4F; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:40:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:40:28 +0100 From: Lars Balker Rasmussen To: ports@freebsd.org, perl@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080226154028.GN13264@tux.nerdheaven.dk> References: <86zltpzrxt.fsf@ds4.des.no> <759236930802242324o614598d1i1a8ca3cc8c12478c@mail.gmail.com> <86prulibf4.fsf@ds4.des.no> <759236930802250245j646f5be5k8382bedbfb2a7c1e@mail.gmail.com> <868x19i6ky.fsf@ds4.des.no> <759236930802251702h694c4f5bn2c7c87c7c47c7cc@mail.gmail.com> <20080226122512.GA30778@heechee.tobez.org> <86ve4bsx8l.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080226140456.GB30778@heechee.tobez.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080226140456.GB30778@heechee.tobez.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at nerdheaven.dk Cc: Subject: Re: Port dependencies on p5-Test-* X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:40:31 -0000 On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > What do people think of this? If we see positive reaction, we'll just > temporarily switch from coding in Perl to coding in make. :-) This very closely represents what I've been trying to formulate. Go for it! But how will we handle PERL_TEST_DEPENDS vs. the cpan packages requirements? By hand, like today, e.g.: @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e '/build_requires/d' ${WRKSRC}/Makefile.PL -- Lars Balker Rasmussen Consult::Perl