From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 4 16:26:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60EA2507; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B3559AB; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6532C21597; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:25:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Mar 2014 11:25:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; s=smtpout; bh=5Oh9nrsiHKOpDdnZ/1EFZtDoikM=; b=Yc b5F2I/u0uYSv9EIGLbfMkjTz2qjwMpk2RR/F2Y4V/VmeDmRJVLaGVBONNbDxd0Mr mHOvN6oX64HFPya8qDDs6B/DTRl8eu5kfTDjIDsKw/QcQ5lino96MybeMfxFOYMk 0bnBTbO157FwYGLClxPfhklcjRCReMsNnpprvKIjE= X-Sasl-enc: chlEcHGw2AvwNNOsQqWdMoc7GbZUiKN52cWEkPlmrbxF 1393950344 Received: from [172.16.1.145] (unknown [68.117.126.78]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8B5FD68037C; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:25:43 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: freebsd 10.0 not work carp protocol on Hyper-v From: Mark Felder In-Reply-To: <1492436824.5843722.1393949513726.JavaMail.zimbra@cost.it> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:25:42 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2AFDF12C-2655-484E-A217-6BBC2FC5E4A4@FreeBSD.org> References: <77152523.5202330.1393757388176.JavaMail.zimbra@cost.it> <531456AA.50203@freebsd.org> <20140303122850.212f8c18@tikal.homenet.telecomitalia.it> <1393945740.22165.90432305.73C1DA68@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1492436824.5843722.1393949513726.JavaMail.zimbra@cost.it> To: Giovanni Mattera X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Cc: Maurizio Marini , freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org, Manuel Martini , FreeBSD Net X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 16:26:03 -0000 On Mar 4, 2014, at 10:11, Giovanni Mattera = wrote: > Yes i test it but not work > The CARP protocolol remain in state INIT. >=20 That's unfortunate. If you do a packet dump do you even see the other = node's advertisements? CARP is really at the mercy of these half-baked virtual switches; if = they refuse to pass the traffic there's not much that can be done from = the virtualized guest's perspective. I don't know the procedure for = opening a support case with Microsoft but if that's an option it would = be nice to know what their response is. I did run into this a while back on XenServer and wondered if it would = be possible to work around it by doing a GRE tunnel between the two = nodes and doing CARP over that, tying it all in with scripts that are = called by devd events. I have not had time to experiment and see if you = can do multicast over GRE tunnels though and it's probably a very bad = idea.=