From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 21 7:55: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D698937B402 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:54:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id A2261532C; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:54:57 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Andrey A. Chernov" Cc: mark@grondar.za, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step6, corresponding /etc/pam.d/* fixes for review References: <20020121142038.GA36519@nagual.pp.ru> <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 21 Jan 2002 16:54:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20020121154244.GC37234@nagual.pp.ru> Message-ID: Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: > One reason still exist: all users (i.e. non-OPIE too) will see OTP > responses when pam_opie will be uncommented. It may leads to confusion or > wrong automated scripts processing. Ah, I thought pam_opie(8) ignored users that didn't have OPIE set up. Silly me for making assumptions :) > I have idea to solve it adding "no_fake_prompts" option to pam_opie to > control that per admin choice. Yep, excellent idea. I'll get right on it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message