From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 22 20:15:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AE2B20; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41208FC0A; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id s9so7822348iec.27 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:15:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3eAg69rHIdSZIhqQXvnNRTxcjJjf8ygpO5BKni8uz1g=; b=gTAG6juJsohxMkrF1Bjw/gah2IQktFrTgNIDm7JuInDuSzPGcvshoyRurFP5DJVy/M CfBeJqc55DiyELN+1FW00L10MQ0UDn/3mwwt8H/peo4jpNuDOSD5xCcTPvMJXnMpMriz 8E9Yf1cpFnGJXj1vRh13B2cpVMxVrJ9GOM5MlVuuIz4CppfAhVaMFtF3ymrpjZTBcQK+ dZ1yJWGhsla4gkQUjkeLlgnKmOdxOVt7/C3luCpnl9rwSBkjk7Wt410gvwtLM7jfq5WR dUyu1sVFMwqqTEGh/s1UWrf8G1SomwDFBIFISDMEoAjwTpSHhrArQxsmEckb7AbFJqGl Kg/w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.98.80 with SMTP id r16mr2031591icn.45.1356207321297; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:15:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.88.137 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Dec 2012 12:15:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50D602AD.3000304@FreeBSD.org> References: <201211060023.qA60NhFW028290@svn.freebsd.org> <5098E619.3070902@FreeBSD.org> <50D602AD.3000304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:15:21 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r307045 - head/Mk From: "b.f." To: Andriy Gapon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Gerald Pfeifer , Eitan Adler , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Gerald Pfeifer X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 20:15:28 -0000 On 12/22/12, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 22/12/2012 20:54 Gerald Pfeifer said the following: >> On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> Have you filed a PR about the broken ports? >> >> That's where "And, unlike compilation errors, failure to locate >> run-time libraries (or the right ones) is a lot harder to detect >> and we currently don't have a way to do so automatically" comes >> into play, unfortunately. Or I would have. > > So, do you even recall why you even have those flags in CFLAGS? > Or has it always been "just in case"? :-) > ... or in FFLAGS... No, it hasn't always been "just in case" -- there were ports that failed. I don't recall the details, and some of these have since been fixed ( I patched some of them myself), but I'd guess that there are still a substantial number of ports that don't respect LDFLAGS (it isn't so long since we even asked them to, after Dmitry made a heroic effort for ports/157936). b. > -- > Andriy Gapon >