From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 23 23:31:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17934D9B for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alto.onthenet.com.au (alto.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.68.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0AA212 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dommail.onthenet.com.au (dommail.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.70.57]) by alto.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D855A12713; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:31:10 +1000 (EST) Received: from Peter-Grehans-MacBook-Pro-2.local ([64.245.0.210]) by dommail.onthenet.com.au (MOS 4.4.4-GA) with ESMTP id BZF03345 (AUTH peterg@ptree32.com.au); Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:31:09 +1000 Message-ID: <54498FBB.5060904@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:31:07 -0700 From: Peter Grehan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Conrad Rad Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bhyve: Support /domain/bootloader configuration for non-FreeBSD guests. References: <1414094284-29055-1-git-send-email-cse.cem@gmail.com> <1414094284-29055-2-git-send-email-cse.cem@gmail.com> <54498764.6080404@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Conrad Meyer , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 23:31:13 -0000 Hi Conrad, > Unless I'm mistaken, the userspace loaders are still needed to boot > VMs for now. That's correct. > Will the Bhyve UEFI work be complete before MeetBSD? Most likely not. > And is it going into the FreeBSD 10 release branch, or only in 11? It will be MFCable. > Until that code actually materializes, I think it's important to fix > libvirt now. This change doesn't break a future Bhyve-that-supports > EUFI, and it can even be yanked out later if totally redundant. Good - I just wanted to make sure this change (or characterization of bhyve as PV) wasn't something that would hurt long-term. later, Peter.