From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 24 4:53:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from antiochus-fe0.ultra.net (antiochus-fe0.ultra.net [146.115.8.188]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E691737B5C0 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 04:53:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from moncrg@ma.ultranet.com) Received: from ma.ultranet.com (216-164-247-246.s246.tnt3.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com [216.164.247.246]) by antiochus-fe0.ultra.net (8.8.8/ult/n20340/mtc.v2) with ESMTP id HAA20256 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 07:53:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <390435AC.4D3D9A2F@ma.ultranet.com> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 06:53:16 -0500 From: "Gregory D. Moncreaff" Reply-To: moncrg@ma.ultranet.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: is this a bug in ls? References: <390391E2.4A803B86@ma.ultranet.com> <20000423213504.H70371@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I guess 'ls' has a window about which it displays more detailed time info than the year. just never seen it applied in the future direction I must have got some files with bad timestamps. [usr/ports/distfiles/tcl, tk 8.3 was doing an ls to see which were the newest and oldest distfiles] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message