From nobody Mon Mar  9 13:53:57 2026
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
	by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fTz4w3XBYz6VmhK
	for <freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2026 13:53:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4fTz4v6CkFz47tH
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2026 13:53:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
	none
Received: from pi (uid 104)
	(envelope-from pi@freebsd.org)
	id 9ec5a
	by fc.opsec.eu (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.13+ on fc.opsec.eu);
	Mon, 09 Mar 2026 14:53:57 +0100
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 14:53:57 +0100
From: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>
To: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de>
Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: State of Elasticsearch and related ports
Message-ID: <aa7Q9TEwUPJXcGo1@fc.opsec.eu>
References: <A5C06584-C8B9-4978-B0FF-7FB9620D1A89@punkt.de>
 <aawUmaomyk9xPmMa@fc.opsec.eu>
 <24BA4834-620A-42EA-B58E-18C86A7507E5@punkt.de>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports
List-Help: <mailto:ports+help@freebsd.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ports@freebsd.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ports+subscribe@freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ports+unsubscribe@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <24BA4834-620A-42EA-B58E-18C86A7507E5@punkt.de>
X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action;
	module=replies;
	Message is reply to one we originated
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00];
	REPLY(-4.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4fTz4v6CkFz47tH
X-Spamd-Bar: ----

Hi!

> > As I'm not a user, can someone explain to me if we really need 9.1 and 9.2
> > versions in parallel in the tree?
> 
> I asked our local Elasticsearch guru and he cannot think of a reason to
> use 9.1 instead of 9.2 assuming the latter is available.
> 
> It would be great to have current Elasticsearch ports and packages again.

saro@ said that there are now 9.3 Elasticsearch releases ?

How often do you as a 'user org' need 9.2 and 9.3 to test migrations etc ?

-- 
pi@FreeBSD.org         +49 171 3101372                  Now what ?