From owner-cvs-doc Sun Oct 5 02:37:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA09306 for cvs-doc-outgoing; Sun, 5 Oct 1997 02:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA09297; Sun, 5 Oct 1997 02:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA03724; Sun, 5 Oct 1997 02:36:10 -0700 (PDT) To: Brian Somers cc: Brian Somers , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/handbook submitters.sgml In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 Oct 1997 10:29:42 BST." <199710050929.KAA11312@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 02:36:09 -0700 Message-ID: <3720.876044169@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > This made me notice that various people like Julian E, Joerg, Jordan > and Andrey appear here as well as in authors.sgml. Do people really > want this (or should I refer from submitters to authors) ? I think you should "collapse" information like this whenever and however possible. ;) > Also, should *all* addresses in authors.sgml be @FreeBSD.org ? A few > aren't (I'm guilty for starters). It looks nicer, but I suppose there are a few who have a personal preference about not indirecting through freebsd.org, perhaps? I always wondered why some chose to be deliberately different (a few were added as @freebsd.org but changed their entries with subsequent commits). Jordan