From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jul 5 15: 5: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from ns2.sysadmin-inc.com (ns2.sysadmin-inc.com [209.16.228.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C129137B407 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 15:05:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@sysadmin-inc.com) Received: (qmail 1543 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jul 2001 22:05:03 -0000 Message-ID: <20010705220503.1542.qmail@ns2.sysadmin-inc.com> From: "Peter Brezny" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: simple mpd-netgraph quesiton Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 22:05:03 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've got mpd-netgraph configured to load multiple pptp configurations on startup default: load pptp1 load pptp2 load pptp3 load pptp4 load pptp5 load pptp6 I just noticed today, however, this error message Jul 5 17:59:23 slgw mpd: mpd: bundle "pptp" already exists Jul 5 17:59:24 slgw last message repeated 4 times So I went back into the configuration file... My Question is, is it correct to have the new -i statement pointing to an identical set of information for each pptp configuration? E.G. pptp1: new -i ng0 pptp pptp ... pptp2: new -i ng0 pptp pptp OR, do I need to do something like this? pptp1: new -i ng0 pptp pptp1 ... pptp2: new -i ng1 pptp pptp2 Thanks for your help. Peter Brezny SysAdmin Services Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message