From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug  5 21:49:50 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756951065674
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  5 Aug 2010 21:49:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com
	[74.125.82.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56ED8FC0C
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  5 Aug 2010 21:49:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so8853383wyj.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=ySi0I2PXp3xKs39ccu5+RXeRNXdZUliuqBE4N6H/Eng=;
	b=G6KCegIjytbA46kJpP7mgBitXDS/qIgXVXiCk0rpE13vDYwjhafo4BHbj4DEz8+EmJ
	w6mEkPf+7T+++xH1dDXxJE8huaPYh5Xy0Ka3AoCGSM06x4GDC5bL2tfFQN5F5kJeI9Uq
	msSJN1G7uRpYTpsz0kXETpvXezSmZEBfTOVAo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
	:content-type;
	b=qCeXytFTHi5A+dWey5Bq0rs3O0mINSOyRgWu0HYeLDj7EHCyaKv6FJo6PGWkAIl8Qb
	YB6F/Q5QyGyKSIb6MMbNN3H0jpc5GqvdSDUoPbXo4Aqh3A2qHRhMU8gmxNfPAx/YjBtU
	8f/WGyUo/sK22QdL4+aDi8dlK/fx1DRL7roYk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.134.136 with SMTP id j8mr9812706wbt.206.1281044988612; 
	Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.183.212 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 21:49:48 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=X6cSErnPQ+oLbBhifRiK_Os2z58a6YxFwK2i5@mail.gmail.com>
From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: gerald@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
Subject: Re: Add -lssp_nonshared to GCC's LIB_SPEC unconditionally
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:49:50 -0000

On Tue Aug 3 15:22:00 UTC 2010, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
...
>I therefore propose the following change to always link in
>libssp_nonshared.a.  I think this change is harmless when the symbol is
>not needed in one of the objects linked together since the linker won't
>pull in the library member "ssp-local.o" in the target object.

Will this do the right thing when the base system is built
WITHOUT_SSP? How about the case of
WITHOUT_DYNAMICROOT/NOSHARED/NO_SHARED=yes, with and without this
change?  Are changes to the specs of the lang/gcc* ports needed? What
about clang?

b.