From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 30 05:40:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317BF16A4CF for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 05:40:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC18643D2F for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 05:40:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i9U5eFY08993; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:40:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:40:15 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <13c.4dfe782.2eb3ac41@aol.com> Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: GPL vs BSD Licence X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 05:40:21 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of TM4525@aol.com > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:23 AM > To: davids@webmaster.com > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: GPL vs BSD Licence > > > The GPL is a myth. It will never be tested because if it is, it > will lose all > of > its teeth. Its much more useful in a speculative state. I don't believe that the GPL will never be tested in court. In fact I think that the FSF is really wanting to see it tested in court so that it gains some legitimacy. But I think that they are waiting for the right case to come along - one that would be so obviouly favorable to them that they would almost be guarenteed to win it. Ted